H.R 5055 may never be voted into law, but it spurs a much-needed debate about the need to protect fashion by copyright.
Last month, the WSJ quoted law professors Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman: "If copying were illegal, the fashion cycle would occur very slowly, if at all." (article on the SSRN site here). Congressman Goodlatte, who introduced H.R. 5055, notes in a statement that "the production life cycle for a fashion design is very short", and thus a designer may not have every opportunity to cash in on on particularly good idea.
Would this bill slow the fashion cycle, and would slowing the fashion cycle make it more profitable for designers, especially young designers?
Trends would not be protected by H.R. 5055. Representative Goodlatte made it clear during last July legislative hearing, and rightfully so, as trends are mere ideas, too elusive to be protected. One could protect the inspiration book of a designer, the mix of pictures, swatches, art and so on that may have inspired a collection (Christian Lacroix published Journal d'une Collection in 1996, written with Patrick Mauriès), but the idea behind the collection. If you ever watched a designer being interviewed after presenting a collection, or attended a collection, you know that designers love to share their sources of inspiration (Swinging Sixties Fairies, NASCAR...) for the particular collection (click on trends for an example)
RE: Cyberlaw, IP, rivacy in the USA and Europe NB: This site is 100% legal-advice free.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Labels
- ACTA
- Anomymat sur Internet
- Art Law
- Avatars
- Biometry
- blogs
- Book Worm Report
- Censorship
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Compteurs Intelligents
- Contrefaçon
- Cookies
- Copie Privée
- Copyright
- Copyright Fair Use
- Counterfeiting
- Cyberlaw
- Cybersquatting
- Data Breaches
- Data Mining
- Data Privacy
- Database
- Defamation
- Diffamation
- Digital Identity
- DMP
- DNA
- Droit a l'image
- Droit à l'Oubli
- Droit de Réponse
- Droit Moral
- Droits Voisins
- e-commercre
- ECPA
- emails
- Fashion and Copyright
- Fashion and Patents
- Fashion and Trademark
- Fashion News
- FCC
- Fingerprints
- First Amendment
- Flag
- Fourth Amendment
- France
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of the Press
- French IP Law
- FTC
- Genetic Privacy
- Google's Book Settlement
- GPS
- Great Britain
- HADOPI
- How to be an Attorney
- HR 5055
- HR 683
- ID cards
- Identité Génétique
- Identity
- Identity Theft
- Indecent Speech
- International Privacy
- Internet of Things
- Internet Privacy
- Internet Security
- IP Address
- Locational Privacy
- LOPPSI 2
- Misc.
- Net Neutrality
- New York Privacy Laws
- New York State
- Online Identity
- Online Impersonation
- Online Privacy
- Pacifica
- Parody
- Passwords
- Patriot Act
- Privacy
- Privacy as a Human Right
- Privacy Breach as a Crime
- privacy in European Union
- Privacy in the EU
- Privacy in the Workplace
- Privacy Settings
- Professions Juridiques
- Propriété Intellectuelle
- Public Domain
- Public Records
- RFID
- Right of Publicity
- RSS
- Safe Harbor
- SCA
- Section 230
- Security Breaches
- Smart Grids
- Social Network
- Sports Law
- Subpoenas
- Surveillance
- Text-Messaging
- The Public Voice
- Three-Strikes
- Thrift Store Tee Shirts
- Trade Dress
- Trademark
- Trademark and Marketing
- Trademark Dilution
- Trademark Fair Use
- Trademark Infringement
- UK
- US Privacy Laws
- Vie Privee
- Virtual Worlds
- Web 2.0
- WHOIS
- Yankees
No comments:
Post a Comment