The U.S. filed a lawsuit on September 24 against the State of Illinois, seeking to invalidate Illinois Public Act 095-0138, The Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act.
The Illinois law, which will be effective on January 1st, 2008, prohibits employers to enrol in an Employment Eligibility Verification System, i.e. , a database allowing them to check the immigration status of new hires, as they are authorized to do so by federal law, 8 U.S.C. 1324(a). Such verification system includes E-Verify, an online database system operated by the Department of Homeland Security.
Illinois legislators were concerned that the systems currently available to employers are not accurate enough. The law would remain in effect until the Social Security Administration (SSA) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) databases can determine that their databases are 99% accurate.
The law also requires that employers must safeguard the information provided by the workers, by using passwords and "other privacy protections", to prevent its use by unauthorized person, and to protect their confidentiality. This law may thus prevent, incidentally, the use of such information by unscrupulous employees, allowing them to steal the identities of the candidates. Once again, it shows that all compagnies have a responsability in establishing, and enforcing, clear privacy procedures. Whether it should be a legal obligation, or only a choice, is a question that is still open. As an European, I favor the legal solution, and approve the Illinois legislature. However, the law does not make any provisions for fining the companies that would not put such a policy in place.
RE: Cyberlaw, IP, rivacy in the USA and Europe NB: This site is 100% legal-advice free.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Labels
- ACTA
- Anomymat sur Internet
- Art Law
- Avatars
- Biometry
- blogs
- Book Worm Report
- Censorship
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Compteurs Intelligents
- Contrefaçon
- Cookies
- Copie Privée
- Copyright
- Copyright Fair Use
- Counterfeiting
- Cyberlaw
- Cybersquatting
- Data Breaches
- Data Mining
- Data Privacy
- Database
- Defamation
- Diffamation
- Digital Identity
- DMP
- DNA
- Droit a l'image
- Droit à l'Oubli
- Droit de Réponse
- Droit Moral
- Droits Voisins
- e-commercre
- ECPA
- emails
- Fashion and Copyright
- Fashion and Patents
- Fashion and Trademark
- Fashion News
- FCC
- Fingerprints
- First Amendment
- Flag
- Fourth Amendment
- France
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of the Press
- French IP Law
- FTC
- Genetic Privacy
- Google's Book Settlement
- GPS
- Great Britain
- HADOPI
- How to be an Attorney
- HR 5055
- HR 683
- ID cards
- Identité Génétique
- Identity
- Identity Theft
- Indecent Speech
- International Privacy
- Internet of Things
- Internet Privacy
- Internet Security
- IP Address
- Locational Privacy
- LOPPSI 2
- Misc.
- Net Neutrality
- New York Privacy Laws
- New York State
- Online Identity
- Online Impersonation
- Online Privacy
- Pacifica
- Parody
- Passwords
- Patriot Act
- Privacy
- Privacy as a Human Right
- Privacy Breach as a Crime
- privacy in European Union
- Privacy in the EU
- Privacy in the Workplace
- Privacy Settings
- Professions Juridiques
- Propriété Intellectuelle
- Public Domain
- Public Records
- RFID
- Right of Publicity
- RSS
- Safe Harbor
- SCA
- Section 230
- Security Breaches
- Smart Grids
- Social Network
- Sports Law
- Subpoenas
- Surveillance
- Text-Messaging
- The Public Voice
- Three-Strikes
- Thrift Store Tee Shirts
- Trade Dress
- Trademark
- Trademark and Marketing
- Trademark Dilution
- Trademark Fair Use
- Trademark Infringement
- UK
- US Privacy Laws
- Vie Privee
- Virtual Worlds
- Web 2.0
- WHOIS
- Yankees
No comments:
Post a Comment