American Family Insurance has a program, Teen Safe Driver, allowing parents of teenage drivers to sign up for the program, and monitor the behaviour of their children behind the wheel.
A DriveCam camera, fixed in front of the car, facing the driver, will monitor the teenage driver.
According to the program's web site and the video, not data is saved, unless the 10 seconds before, and 10 seconds after an "erratic vehicle movement" such as hard breaking , or quick acceleration. These images are transmitted wirelessly to an "analysis center" for review, and the parents receive a report card and a risk score.
I am an advocate of safe driving, and I am often appalled by the dangerous way some people drive, teenagers and grown-ups, yet this program makes me shiver. It comes down to this general question: is accepting more surveillance the only way to achieve a sense of security? In order to get this elusive sense of security, do we need to feel we are under the constant watch of benevolent parents, our own parents when teenagers, then benevolent corporations monitoring our daily lives, and grading them according to their own scale?
The way we eat has a great incidence on our health, and the disease we may develop in the future. Should we then install a camera in the refrigerator and the pantry, and the data be transmiited to tour health insurer? And should my Sonicare transmit my brushing (and flossing, mind you) to my dentist?
RE: Cyberlaw, IP, rivacy in the USA and Europe NB: This site is 100% legal-advice free.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Labels
- ACTA
- Anomymat sur Internet
- Art Law
- Avatars
- Biometry
- blogs
- Book Worm Report
- Censorship
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Compteurs Intelligents
- Contrefaçon
- Cookies
- Copie Privée
- Copyright
- Copyright Fair Use
- Counterfeiting
- Cyberlaw
- Cybersquatting
- Data Breaches
- Data Mining
- Data Privacy
- Database
- Defamation
- Diffamation
- Digital Identity
- DMP
- DNA
- Droit a l'image
- Droit à l'Oubli
- Droit de Réponse
- Droit Moral
- Droits Voisins
- e-commercre
- ECPA
- emails
- Fashion and Copyright
- Fashion and Patents
- Fashion and Trademark
- Fashion News
- FCC
- Fingerprints
- First Amendment
- Flag
- Fourth Amendment
- France
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of the Press
- French IP Law
- FTC
- Genetic Privacy
- Google's Book Settlement
- GPS
- Great Britain
- HADOPI
- How to be an Attorney
- HR 5055
- HR 683
- ID cards
- Identité Génétique
- Identity
- Identity Theft
- Indecent Speech
- International Privacy
- Internet of Things
- Internet Privacy
- Internet Security
- IP Address
- Locational Privacy
- LOPPSI 2
- Misc.
- Net Neutrality
- New York Privacy Laws
- New York State
- Online Identity
- Online Impersonation
- Online Privacy
- Pacifica
- Parody
- Passwords
- Patriot Act
- Privacy
- Privacy as a Human Right
- Privacy Breach as a Crime
- privacy in European Union
- Privacy in the EU
- Privacy in the Workplace
- Privacy Settings
- Professions Juridiques
- Propriété Intellectuelle
- Public Domain
- Public Records
- RFID
- Right of Publicity
- RSS
- Safe Harbor
- SCA
- Section 230
- Security Breaches
- Smart Grids
- Social Network
- Sports Law
- Subpoenas
- Surveillance
- Text-Messaging
- The Public Voice
- Three-Strikes
- Thrift Store Tee Shirts
- Trade Dress
- Trademark
- Trademark and Marketing
- Trademark Dilution
- Trademark Fair Use
- Trademark Infringement
- UK
- US Privacy Laws
- Vie Privee
- Virtual Worlds
- Web 2.0
- WHOIS
- Yankees
No comments:
Post a Comment