The European Parliament reinstated yesterday Amendment 138 of the “Telecom Package” that had been rejected by the Council, which would prevent government to restrict user’s access to the Internet without prior ruling by the judicial authorities. According to the initial wording of the amendment “no restrictions may be imposed on the fundamental rights and freedoms of end users, without a prior ruling of the judicial authorities, notably in accordance with Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights", but it was replaced by "and the right to a judgement by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law and acting in respect of due process in accordance with Article 6 of the ECHR."
France had fought hard against Amendment 138 which would protect users’ rights against the three-strikes sanctions that is at the core of the hotly debated French Internet and Creation bill. The government did not succeed of having it voted on April 9, and a new version of the bill is currently debated by the French Parliament. If voted, article L. 331-25 of the French IP Code would allow that the Internet access of a customer having infringed his obligations can be suspended “for a period of two months to one year with the impossibility for the subscriber, to subscribe for the same period another contract for access to a communication service to the public online at any operator.”
The law created the HADOPI, the « Haute Autorité pour la Diffusion des Œuvres et la Protection des Droits sur Internet » (High Authority for the Diffusion of works and protection of rights on the Internet), an independent Administrative Authority. The HADOPI is in charge of enforcing the « three strikes and you’re out” law. It would fist send an email to the user downloading protected materials, then a registered letter, before finally made the decision to cut access for two months. But the HADOPI is not an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law and acting in respect of due process in accordance with Article 6 of the ECHR" so, according to amendment 138, has no right to cut Internet access.
So, as of today, the future of the HADOPi bill is bleak. Did I hear a sight of relief?
RE: Cyberlaw, IP, rivacy in the USA and Europe NB: This site is 100% legal-advice free.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Labels
- ACTA
- Anomymat sur Internet
- Art Law
- Avatars
- Biometry
- blogs
- Book Worm Report
- Censorship
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Compteurs Intelligents
- Contrefaçon
- Cookies
- Copie Privée
- Copyright
- Copyright Fair Use
- Counterfeiting
- Cyberlaw
- Cybersquatting
- Data Breaches
- Data Mining
- Data Privacy
- Database
- Defamation
- Diffamation
- Digital Identity
- DMP
- DNA
- Droit a l'image
- Droit à l'Oubli
- Droit de Réponse
- Droit Moral
- Droits Voisins
- e-commercre
- ECPA
- emails
- Fashion and Copyright
- Fashion and Patents
- Fashion and Trademark
- Fashion News
- FCC
- Fingerprints
- First Amendment
- Flag
- Fourth Amendment
- France
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of the Press
- French IP Law
- FTC
- Genetic Privacy
- Google's Book Settlement
- GPS
- Great Britain
- HADOPI
- How to be an Attorney
- HR 5055
- HR 683
- ID cards
- Identité Génétique
- Identity
- Identity Theft
- Indecent Speech
- International Privacy
- Internet of Things
- Internet Privacy
- Internet Security
- IP Address
- Locational Privacy
- LOPPSI 2
- Misc.
- Net Neutrality
- New York Privacy Laws
- New York State
- Online Identity
- Online Impersonation
- Online Privacy
- Pacifica
- Parody
- Passwords
- Patriot Act
- Privacy
- Privacy as a Human Right
- Privacy Breach as a Crime
- privacy in European Union
- Privacy in the EU
- Privacy in the Workplace
- Privacy Settings
- Professions Juridiques
- Propriété Intellectuelle
- Public Domain
- Public Records
- RFID
- Right of Publicity
- RSS
- Safe Harbor
- SCA
- Section 230
- Security Breaches
- Smart Grids
- Social Network
- Sports Law
- Subpoenas
- Surveillance
- Text-Messaging
- The Public Voice
- Three-Strikes
- Thrift Store Tee Shirts
- Trade Dress
- Trademark
- Trademark and Marketing
- Trademark Dilution
- Trademark Fair Use
- Trademark Infringement
- UK
- US Privacy Laws
- Vie Privee
- Virtual Worlds
- Web 2.0
- WHOIS
- Yankees
No comments:
Post a Comment